anam_moon: (Poison Ivy)
[personal profile] anam_moon
The Apple computer was invented in a garage. Same with the Google search engine. Now, tinkerers are working at home with the basic building blocks of life itself.

Using homemade lab equipment and the wealth of scientific knowledge available online, these hobbyists are trying to create new life forms through genetic engineering — a field long dominated by Ph.D.s toiling in university and corporate laboratories.

In her San Francisco dining room lab, for example, 31-year-old computer programmer Meredith L. Patterson is trying to develop genetically altered yogurt bacteria that will glow green to signal the presence of melamine, the chemical that turned Chinese-made baby formula and pet food deadly.

"People can really work on projects for the good of humanity while learning about something they want to learn about in the process," she said.

So far, no major gene-splicing discoveries have come out anybody's kitchen or garage.

But critics of the movement worry that these amateurs could one day unleash an environmental or medical disaster. Defenders say the future Bill Gates of biotech could be developing a cure for cancer in the garage.

Many of these amateurs may have studied biology in college but have no advanced degrees and are not earning a living in the biotechnology field. Some proudly call themselves "biohackers" — innovators who push technological boundaries and put the spread of knowledge before profits.

In Cambridge, Mass., a group called DIYbio is setting up a community lab where the public could use chemicals and lab equipment, including a used freezer, scored for free off Craigslist, that drops to 80 degrees below zero, the temperature needed to keep many kinds of bacteria alive.

Co-founder Mackenzie Cowell, a 24-year-old who majored in biology in college, said amateurs will probably pursue serious work such as new vaccines and super-efficient biofuels, but they might also try, for example, to use squid genes to create tattoos that glow.

Cowell said such unfettered creativity could produce important discoveries.

"We should try to make science more sexy and more fun and more like a game," he said.

Patterson, the computer programmer, wants to insert the gene for fluorescence into yogurt bacteria, applying techniques developed in the 1970s.

She learned about genetic engineering by reading scientific papers and getting tips from online forums. She ordered jellyfish DNA for a green fluorescent protein from a biological supply company for less than $100. And she built her own lab equipment, including a gel electrophoresis chamber, or DNA analyzer, which she constructed for less than $25, versus more than $200 for a low-end off-the-shelf model.

Jim Thomas of ETC Group, a biotechnology watchdog organization, warned that synthetic organisms in the hands of amateurs could escape and cause outbreaks of incurable diseases or unpredictable environmental damage.

"Once you move to people working in their garage or other informal location, there's no safety process in place," he said.

Some also fear that terrorists might attempt do-it-yourself genetic engineering. But Patterson said: "A terrorist doesn't need to go to the DIYbio community. They can just enroll in their local community college."

By Associated Press Writer, Marcus Wohlsen

Date: 2008-12-29 05:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] palecur.livejournal.com
Hah, my pal [livejournal.com profile] maradydd has been making the news -- she's the Patterson in the article. I knew she'd been in Slashdot but not this article. Nifty!

Date: 2008-12-29 06:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] devonapple.livejournal.com
This worries me... I think the EPA might want to draft some laws about this.

Date: 2008-12-30 09:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anam-moon.livejournal.com
I am inclined to agree. I applaud the questing for knowledge and new discoveries, but I would like to think certain conditions are being maintained for this sort of tinkering.

Date: 2008-12-30 03:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jackkansas.livejournal.com
A few years ago, Freeman Dyson had an article in the New York Review of Books extolling the virtues of a kind of "open source" approach to gene splicing. He seemed completely oblivious to the potential dangers of homebrew pandemics, and seemed to have been completely unaware of the dangers posed just by software malware, let alone things like bubonic rootkits. I had intended to write a sharp response, but never got a round to it.

The survival value of human intelligence has yet to be demonstrated ...

Profile

anam_moon: (Default)
anam_moon

April 2011

S M T W T F S
     12
34 56 789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 7th, 2025 11:39 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios